Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 18
May 18
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It seems very likely that this image was taken from an old version of the Thames Valley Police website. Note similarity to this archived image shown here [1]. The fact that it indicates Kidlington as "headquarters" is a big give away, plus the fact that the boundaries and names are not in general use, but were only used by this police force. Add to this the fact that at least two of this user's small number of contributions have been copyrighted images taken from websites and uploaded as his own work, I would have to think this one is similar, so would suggest deletion Lozleader (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly a case where a free equivalent could be created that would present the same information. It's just a chart - one can create another chart based on the (non-copyrightable) information contained in this chart. Plrk (talk) 20:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This image is by a Hammond photographer (I believe), and is probably copyrighted (see User talk:Teeja1, author). A similar picture is available at File:First Baptist Church (Hammond, Indiana).JPG. American Eagle (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.JPG){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.